*
NotSoLilCrippseys wrote: ↑Sun Jun 01, 2025 8:23 am
Another update:
- Compression isn't great at 140-145. Bike has 8k original miles and had sat dormant for nearly a decade in an unheated, dirt-floor garage on the Maine coast. Lower numbers are also not unexpected for a motor that has sat for so long, as I understand. 150-165 would be better, but I'm not seeing sub-120 or a notable gap between cylinders.
 
Excellent troubleshooting there finding the ignition advancer issue.
If you are utilizing a schrader-type valve checked 14mm hose to 12mm spark plug threads reducer-sans a check valve- I feel you are seeing pretty good compression test cylinder pressure readings. Why? 
When I desired to check my '75 GL1000 engine's individual cylinder compression around 2013, I had only my circa late 1960s Fox Valley compression tester. 14mm adapter only. As far as I knew, the new to me engine ran 'good'.. just ride it now  
 
 
Eventually, after I first time (mid-2015) engine idle speed synchronized the brike's carburetors with the vacuum gauge panel I obtained from 
robin 1731, I searched ebay and purchased the used snap-on set I have now. 
It, of course, came without a 12mm hose. A very good 0-250 psi gauge assembly, several 14mm hoses and an 18mm hose or two populated the slots in the red storage case. This sucks...
what to do now?
I then acquired the go-to set of three aluminum spark plug threads adaptors from amazon to adapt the snap-on 14mm hose to 12mm spark plug threads reducer.  With all intake and exhaust valves set at 0.004 inch, my individual test results were 135-ish psi for cylinders 1,3 and 4. To this day I don't understand why cylinder 2 has always recorded ~10 psi greater than the other three cylinders;145-ish psi. At that moment, I was seeing approximately the same often reported 140 psi test results. The engine ran 'good' and variation between all 4 cylinders was 'good', too. okay...forget it and ride  
 
 
When I 
unexpectedly discovered the very affordable ebay 12mm snap-on hose, with all 8 valves set at 0.004 inch, cylinders 1,2,3 and 4 compression test results had increased an average of 20psi. 155-ish for 1,3 and 4....165-ish for #2.
Finally, we test at the Nixon recommended 0.006 inch. With the 12mm snap-on hose, cold engine cranking with a fully charged battery, etc, etcetera, et cetera
Cylinders 1,3 and 4 results were 165-170 ish and the cylinder 2 tested multiple times at 179 -ish. At that time, I was testing many times and had noted, especially with the overachieving #2 cylinder, as the pressure was climbing on the gauge face each successive pressure pulse incremental increase was getting smaller. The needle would fluctuate a few times, then suddenly stop advancing any further. After recognizing it had stopped moving, I released the starter button.
I didn't understand why, but it was repeatable. anyways...
I don't have any historical documentation of what 'performance enhancements'
might have been added to the cylinder heads to influence cylinder 2 to outshine its other three mates.
 Maybe reworked camshafts (Weber Cams, somewhere in California might have been a source?) 
There in a coconut shell is my 2 bits worth of questionable value to most readers