The 95/50 rule

Tips and Recommendations from Guru Mike Nixon

Moderator: Whiskerfish

Post Reply
User avatar
mikenixon
Early 'Wing Guru
Early 'Wing Guru
Posts: 997
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:51 am
Location: Prescott, AZ
Contact:

The 95/50 rule

#1

Post by mikenixon »

Resistance tests, are they used by professional technicians? Not very often. There are actually very compelling reasons to avoid using resistance tests on alternator stators, field coils, ignition pulsers, starter solenoids and ignition coils -- anything containing a wire winding. Professional powersports techs know the truth of this. Consider the facts.

Fact number one: Manufacturers hedge their bets where resistance tests are concerned. Factory service manuals let the proverbial cat out of the bag when they do one or both of two very curious things in connection with resistance tests. First, they will often say "...using XYZ multimeter, part number 123456.". This is not an attempt to sell multimeters. This is an obvious admission that the specification in question is not real-world, being subject as it is to a certain test meter, under certain conditions, including temperature, humidity, and other factors. No good. Resistance clearly is the wrong kind of test for this part. But there's more. Because second, and even more revealing, factory manuals frequently follow resistance specifications with this rather startling troubleshooting advice, "Replace with known good component.". Huh? What is this if not tacit acknowledgement that the factory's resistance specification is tentative and not to be taken at face value. The point is, whatever you call this methodology, it is definitely not troubleshooting!

Fact number two: But the real problem with resistance-testing wire coils is this: A piece of wire a couple hundred feet long coated with lacquer and wrapped into a coil has a habit of losing parts of its insulation and doing crazy things as a result of constant exposure to engine heat and acidic engine oil. Thus these wire coils have a habit of lying to the troubleshooter. When cool and not carrying an electrical load, they can meet factory manual resistance specification. But when stressed by actually working, by carrying current, and thus warmer and undergoing physical, dimensional expansion, and measured using voltage or amps, it is then that they reveal the truth of their condition.

I call this problem with resistance-testing the 95/50 rule. Here's what it means. When a wire coil tests "bad", it is almost surely bad, so the probability that the test result is valid is 95+ percent. Fine. We can work with that. That's the 95 part of the 95/50. But, here's the kicker. If on the other hand the resistance test shows the part is "good", now you have problems. You have a dilemma. Because, with this "good" result, there's no better than a fifty-fifty chance that the part is actually good. Seriously. Because of the issue with wire coil failure modes described above. A part ohmmed good is a real challenge. The falsely good reading of a bad part will lead the technician on all kinds of diagnostic rabbit trails away from the real issue.

So, bad resistance = probably bad. But good resistance = maybe good, maybe bad. A crap shoot, in other words. Electrical parts having wire windings in them absolutely must be dynamically tested. Avoid using resistance tests in troubleshooting parts containing wire coils. Use instead tests of the parts while they are working. Troubleshooting will be faster and the results more conclusive. If you would like to check out another, assenting voice on this, see Dan Sullivan's Fundamental Electrical Troubleshooting, available on Amazon.

Ride safe.
User avatar
CYBORG
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 24645
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 12:52 pm
Location: Muskegon mich

Re: The 95/50 rule

#2

Post by CYBORG »

Good info. And in my experience, spot on.
User avatar
mikenixon
Early 'Wing Guru
Early 'Wing Guru
Posts: 997
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:51 am
Location: Prescott, AZ
Contact:

Re: The 95/50 rule

#3

Post by mikenixon »

CYBORG wrote:Good info. And in my experience, spot on.
:)
User avatar
Whiskerfish
President
President
Posts: 37207
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 9:34 pm
My Album: http://www.ngwclub.com/gallery/v/wingmans/whiskerfish/
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: The 95/50 rule

#4

Post by Whiskerfish »

Excellent explanation! action1 action1 action1 action1


We try hard here to recommend the voltage test for folks doing stator troubleshooting. Definitely a more conclusive test.




.
"Agreement is not a requirement for Respect" CDR Michael Smith USN (Ret) 2017
"The book is wrong, this whole Conclusion is Fallacious" River Tam
"Yea I do dance awkwardly, and I am having more fun than you" Taylor Swift
2008 GL1800 IIIA "TH3DOG"
1984 GL1200 Standard
1975/6/7/8/9 Arthur Fulmer Dressed Road bike
1975 Naked Noisy and Nasty in town bike

Psst. oh and by the way CHANGE YOUR BELTS!!!!
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Mike Nixon's Spot”