Have had a small setback. Working on resolving it. Brief update.
Have wired up the new coil driver, and connected it to the OEM wiring harness for use. Took the OEM spark units out as well as some non-essential vacuum hose.
Wiring diagram for new Bosch 211 coil driver:
New Coil Driver Wiring.jpg
Should work nicely.
Did more research into the OEM spark unit because the 12 VDC power connection to the spark units, these are a four wire spark unit, was befuddling me considering that more newer and widely used spark igniters/coil drivers are generally a three wire. There are exceptions such as the seven and eight pin HEI coil drivers, but these are design exceptions for a specific application much like the Honda spark igniters; however, these exceptions are being used for EFI conversions. Lots of install information available regarding these.
Think I have an answer.
The OEM spark unit appears to use a Darlington Pair transistor design. This is where two transistors are paired together to increase the final output. The triggering and secondary transistor can share the same 12 VDC supply - in this case it would be from the coil, but can be separated. This schematic depicts a Darlington Pair transistor circuit that has a separate 12 VDC connection for the T1 transistor from the electrical system, and the T2 transistor from the coil:
4 Wire Coil Driver.jpg
You can see that that "T1" is triggered by an external signal, in the case of a coil driver in an EFI system, the ECU. The output from "T1" triggers the second transistor in the circuit allowing the coil to charge. I think this schematic is representative of what Honda has designed, but without the actual schematic it is a best guess.
The transistors represented are the NPN "sinking" transistor. There is a PNP transistor. The basic difference is that with the NPN transistor, the load, in this case the coil, is upstream of the transistor - look at the direction arrow. The PNP "sourcing" transistor differs in that the load in question is downstream of the PNP transistor.
This project has turned into a very good learning experience.
The other aspect of this project that is surfacing is that this project is becoming a two-part project. The first part is the primary purpose of replacing/upgrading the OEM ECU. The second part is a modernization of the CFI system components.
The modernization aspect has been mentioned before, but that was not the initial intent. Hindsight being beneficial after the fact, a modernization of the OEM CFI system components could have been part of the planning/research stage.
The challenge with this is that if you keep the OEM ECU, you could have issues with newer, more modern components because these new components have different design specs. Without knowing exactly what the CFI system components design parameters were, you are doing a test and trial modernization.
Doing an EM CFI modernization with a new ECU is simpler. Replacement components have generally been tested and the ECU settings finalized.
Replacing the OEM spark units with newer coil drivers that have been used with the Speeduino, and the programming settings have been determined, increase the odds of a successful conclusion to the project. This is the same for the OEM dual wheel timing trigger system. Changing out to a crank missing tooth timing trigger configuration is the same.
Replacing the injectors, be the injectors low impedance (need resistors to keep circuit current minimized), or high impedance injectors (no need for additional resistors to keep circuit current low) may be a luxury, but the injector specifications, specifically injector dead time may be available. Keeping the OEM injectors will require an iterative process to "dial" in these injectors.
The TPS, IAT and CLT sensors can be used without change, as can the crank (Ns) variable reluctance (VR) sensor.
Using the crank missing tooth trigger wheel allows you to disconnect the cam sensors. A dual wheel timing trigger configuration is only required if you are going to do sequential injector timing/firing. I have read that for a recreational engine, there are some benefits for sequential injector firing regarding emissions in the lower engine RPM/idling range, but not so much in the cruising/upper engine operating range. Another consideration is the wiring has to be changed to suit.
The PB (MAP) sensors can be used, one for the MAP input, the other for a real time barometric sensor. You can get the new ECIU fitted with a MAP sensor. If this on board MAP sensor is not fitted, you will have to do some work to connect the OEM external MAP sensor for both the MAP and Baro inputs. If you choose two not use a Baro sensor, the ECU uses the barometric pressure that is sensed by the MAP sensor for all engine operations. The only time this will change is when you turn the engine OFF and restart. The new barometric pressure reading taken at the place you started the engine will be used.
I will be using the on board MAP sensor and wiring in one of the OEM MAP sensors for a real time barometric sensor.
The issue with components is hopefully someone has gone before, and an alternative component has been used successfully. The second issue that is more challenging is understanding the ECU relationships between the various tables, and component settings. Lots to learn regarding this.
Bit of an update. Cheers